Welcome To The Best Man/Beast Mixes On This Plane!

Coming in 2019: The Return of Mythulinity!

Now that Tumblr has determined the real world of varied sexuality no longer exists, I've decided to head out in a different direction and prove them wrong. It was fun while it lasted and all things must pass. I am now passing on Tumblr and reigniting the flame that once burned bright here at Blogger. Join me!

Here's the goal for our greater good: To share the best material from multiple online sources plus super manimal/mythical and real male images.

WARNING: This blog is devoted to gay adult themes. If you are under the age of consent (18) or are an uptight prude please leave this zone immediately!

Artists and Commission Owners:
If you find your work or property here and do not approve of it being posted on this blog, please contact me at greggerman52@gmail.com I will take it down ASAP.

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Male Art Dept.: Ted Fusby, Objectifier of Men

Unlike Brian Biedul (see previous post), Ted Fusby may confine his figures to boxes of a sort and stark, featureless landscapes, but his intention to highlight the male as possessor of a beautiful physique is plainly evident. 

Fusby's work is almost flat and primitive in some regards with the refined male figures at odds with their environments in subtle ways defined by color fields and geometric shapes. The world these characters exist in has become a reduction of natural elements to zones where the men reside but, obviously, stand apart from. It is as if the fellows have found themselves existing in a world realized by Richard Diebenkorn or Mark Rothko, but denied of either artist's vitality. 

Joy is not something derived from viewing this work. The subjects all bear stoic and inexpressive faces. There is not a display of overt emotion to behold. (Only in a portrait or two do men display teeth or a reluctant smile.) The message here is that you are meant to be seriously engaged in the objectification of these men. The bodies are for open and overt evaluation and appreciative appraisal, but these men are not naked for anything erotic beyond complete exposure (except in a very few pieces). Vulnerability is juxtaposed with physical strength and composure. 

Fusby's men are all of a singular type with only slight variations in head hair and skin color. (The two muscular males I have highlighted in this post belie what most of Fusby's art embraces.) Each man is lean, smooth skinned, and muscular with small nipples and defined abdominal cavities. They all sport crew cuts. Were it not for variations of facial appearance they might all be clones of one another. Even those paintings that feature more than one male subject look as if the two figures are body twins. I am not certain that this is an intentional feature of the art or due to either an overarching appreciation of a singular male form or a lack of skill in portraying anything different. It isn't so much disconcerting as it is bland. And, indeed judging by the frequent dark and plain backgrounds, the blandness, like the facial stoicism, is probably intentional.

All these considerations aside, I still find Mr. Fusby's work interesting if only for his choice of color, shape, and the poses he chooses for his objects.

No comments:

Post a Comment